Short communication / Open Access

DOI: 10.31488/bjcr.108

Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination and adolescent girls in eldoret, Kenya

Hillary Mabeya*1,2, Sonia Menon2,3, David Kaihura1, Omenge Orango1, Davy Vanden Broeck2

  1. Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

  2. International Center of Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Belgium

  3. CDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

*Corresponding author:Hillary Mabeya, MD, PhDc, International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 P3, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, Tel: +32 9 332.43.76

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer caused by human papilloma virus (HPV) nevertheless preventable has claimed the lives of many women worldwide. Human papillomavirus is the main contributory agent of cervical cancer. The HPV vaccination targets young adolescent girls that need parents’ permission for medical interventions. Objectives: To determine the knowledge, attitude, desire and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls by their mothers in Eldoret, Kenya. Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study involving mothers of adolescent girls in Eldoret, Kenya. The data were obtained using semi-structured questionnaires. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics at 95% confidence level using the SPSS software version 22. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: The mean age of 300 respondents was 34 years. The vaccination of adolescent girls against HPV was low at 9.4% (28/300). This study found a high level (85.0%) of cervical cancer awareness but much lower awareness of HPV (60.0%) and HPV vaccine (62.0%). Most respondent’s parents (90.6%) still indicated intentions to vaccinate their daughters in this study. Vaccination practice of women with positive attitudinal response to HPV vaccination was significantly lower than those without p=0.02, 95% CI, OR=0.48 (0.90-0.89). Only three attitudinal parameters; “vaccination of my daughters will prompt early sexual activity and cost of HPV vaccination being a barrier to vaccination” had statistically significant influence on the practice of HPV vaccination of daughters. Positive attitude to cost of HPV vaccine significantly increased up take of HPV vaccination of daughters while negative attitude to daughters’ early onset of sexual activity significantly reduced up take. P value =0.04 and 0.007 respectively. Conclusion: The study concludes that the awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine for prevention of cervical cancer is still moderate among mothers of adolescent daughters in this study. There was predominantly positive attitude towards the use of HPV vaccination for prevention of cervical cancer among respondents; hence the high rate of desire by mothers to vaccinate their daughters. The practice of the HPV vaccination by mothers of adolescent girls was still low. There is need for increased awareness creation by government agencies and caring physicians. Also, there is need for policy to guide and unify various stake holder efforts in the struggle against an increasing cervical cancer burden. . Public health practitioners could therefore enlist NGOs and activists in HPV vaccination programs for influencing adolescent girls and their parents towards increased uptake of the vaccine in our environment.

Keywords: human papilloma virus, adolescents, vaccination, kenya

Introduction

Background of the study

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 528,000 new cases and 266,000 deaths among women each year [1,2]. Cervical cancer related deaths of 266,000, accounts for 7.5% of female cancer death worldwide in 2012 [1,2]. In Kenya, Cervical cancer is the second most frequent cancer after breast cancer and accounts for an average of 2000 deaths per year. Kenya in Each year experience a crude incidence rate of 16.5 per 100,000 women and age standardized rate of 28.7 is reported [1,2]. It is vital that Kenya as a country puts precautionary and involvement measures in place in order to deal with the disease saddle from cervical cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes an all-inclusive approach to cervical cancer prevention and control to identify opportunities to deliver effective involvement [3]. Cervical cancer-related research has increased significantly over the past years. The combine knowledge and advancements for numerous areas of focus within the larger effort of cervical cancer deterrence and management [4,5].

Human papilloma virus (HPV) has almost been wholly identified as the perpetrator in the etiopathogenesis of cervical cancer. It is the most widespread sexually transmitted infection and studies in advanced and highly developed countries posited that 50-80% of sexually exposed are infected at least once in their life time [6,7]. According to Seoud et al. [8], HPV 16 and 18 are commonest oncogenic type and have been implicated in 60- 78% of squamous cancer of the cervix and 72-94% of cervical adenocarcinoma. The management and control of cervical cancer had basically emphasized on early recognition and punctual diagnosis of precancerous lesion of the cervix until the development and introduction of HPV vaccines that offers prospect for primary prevention [9, 10]. These vaccines had approximately total protection against new and constant infection and are recommended for girls between 9 years to 26 years [11-13].

Villa et al. [14] and Harper et al. [15] in their researches on Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) posited that the most effective preventive method against cervical cancer among adolescent girls and other women prior to sexual exposure is the primary prevention by the HPV vaccination. Therefore, World Health Organization recommends offering HPV vaccine to girls at ages 9–14 years, prior to sexual exposure, since the vaccine has highest efficacy if girls have not already acquired HPV [16]. There is need for Kenya Ministry of Health to targets girls at ages of 9-15 years for HPV vaccination [17]. Unlike the vaccines for childhood diseases, HPV vaccination in Kenya is not currently provided during free mass immunization programmes, but the vaccine is available for individual use at a rather expensive rate. HPV vaccination is associated with high costs which may not be affordable to most women in developing countries like Kenya. There is limited knowledge and information on HPV vaccination. Health Information management is a challenge.

HPV vaccination has been recommended for introduction into national immunization programs in various countries [17]. HPV vaccine has been incorporated into the school vaccination program for young adolescent girls in developed countries include: USA, Australia, New Zealand and Sweden. This practice however faces the challenges which are common to new vaccines. Parental consent is needed for the vaccination of minors, for this reason, parental knowledge, attitude to and acceptance to vaccinate their daughters would to a good extent determine the success of the HPV vaccination program. Factors influencing practice of HPV vaccination such as: vaccine awareness, child age, perceived access to the vaccine, societal norms, religious inclination, stigmatization against sexually transmitted infection, vaccine safety & suspect of potential long-term adverse outcome, perception about disease susceptibility and severity, interaction with clinicians, the need to involve the adolescent in decision and mother’s cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer experience are thought to influence the uptake of HPV vaccination in Kenya. Therefore, this studysought to investigate Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination and adolescent girls in Eldoret, Kenya.

Statement of the problem

The progress in HPV vaccination programs and awareness creation about vaccination has remained slow in Kenya. Few studies in our environment have investigated the disposition, attitude, intention to vaccinate and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls by their mothers. Few studies have evaluated the acceptability of the HPV vaccine in Kenya and we found no such studies in Eldoret in particular.

Hence this study aims at determining the knowledge, attitude, desire and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls and factor that determine intent and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls by their mothers in Eldoret. In other to achieve the purpose of this study, the following research questions were answered:

  1. To what extents is the practice of adolescent girls HPV vaccination by mothers in Eldoret?

  2. Do mothers have Knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV and HPV vaccine?

  3. What is the Mothers attitude towards vaccination of their daughters?

  4. What is the factors influencing practice of HPV vaccination of daughters?

Materials and Methods

This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey carried out in Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County in Kenya. Eldoret is a principal city in Western Kenya. It is a capital of Uasin Gishu County. It lying south of Cherangany hill , the location elevation varies from about 2100 metres above the sea level to more than 2700 metres (7000 – 9000 feet). Gynocare women and fistula hospital is located in Eldoret. It is 100 beds hospital dedicated to fistula surgery, gynecological and obstetric care services. The hospital offers cervical cancer screening, vaccination and treatment facilities. The study population included randomly selected mothers of adolescent girls as at the time of the administration of questionnaire. Face-to-face structured interviews were conducted after the purpose of the study had been explained to the participants and their informed consent sought and gained. Women who did not give their consent were excluded from this study. This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at the Gynocare women and fistula hospital Eldoret based on convenience sampling of consenting mothers who accompanied their daughters to gynecological and adolescents clinics. Therefore, selection criteria were done between the months of September and October 2017.

A standardized questionnaire assessing knowledge of HPV, cervical cancer, Pap smear test, vaccine acceptability, and willingness to participate in HPV vaccination as well as demographic characteristics related to HPV and cervical cancer was administered to a total of 300 mothers of adolescent girls. The questionnaire was explained to those partipants who cannot read and understand English correctly. This questionnaire consisted of 5 sections seeking information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents such as age, Marital Status, religion, occupation and educational attainment, their knowledge of Cervical cancer, HPV infection and HPV vaccination, and their attitude and practice of HPV vaccination of the daughters.

The study was tested for validity: (construct validity; establishing correct operational measures for the concepts being studied. Internal validity; for explanatory and casual studies only, not for descriptive or explanatory studies) establishing a casual relationship, thereby certain conditions are shown to lead to another conditions. The depth of knowledge in the questionnaire was determined by grading respondent’s responses on knowledge into poor, good and excellent. Five points Likert’s scale was used to assess attitude; where various degrees of attitude were assessed using options of 1, strongly disagree, 2, disagree, 3, undecided, 4, agree, 5, strongly agree. In addition, the questionnaire was tested for reliability by using Cronbach coefficient alpha to determine the internal consistency of the items. This method was used for estimating reliability of test scores by the use of a single administration of a test. Therefore, provided good measures of reliability because holding other factors constant, the more similar the test content and conditions of administration are, the greater the internal consistency reliability. Data was computed and analyzed using statistical software SPSS for windows version 22. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Frequencies and percentages were determined where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined using p value. P-value of 0.05 is considered significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics of respondents

It was paramount to seek this information to ascertain the background of the respondents and relate it the knowledge, attitude, desire and practice of HPV vaccination on adolescent girls and factor that determine intent and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls in Eldoret. In this study, respondent mothers were administered with questionnaire and interviewed. Below table shows some demographic data of respondents. A total of three hundred questionnaires (300) respondents who completed their questionnaires out of 310 who were administered with questionnaires giving a response rate of 96.7%. The mean age of the respondents was 34 years. Majority of the respondents were married, (88%) were Christians while the rest (12.0%) were Muslims, (30%) of the respondents were civil servants, (20%) Health worker, (18%) into a business, (5.0%) artisans, (27.0%) housewives, and (15.0%) had primary education, (30.0%) had secondary education, and (35.0%) had tertiary education while (20.0%) had no education at all. This study shows that socio-demographic characteristics of individuals such as age (???? = 0.039), marital status (???? = 0.0), occupation (???? = 0.0), level of education (???? = 0.002), and religion (???? = 0.0) have significant effects on their willingness to participate in research.

Table 2 shows the awareness and level of knowledge of cervical cancer, Human Papilloma Virus and HPV vaccine. Most of the respondents 85.0% were aware of cervical cancer, while 60.0% and 62.0% were aware of human papilloma virus and human papilloma vaccine respectively. Majority of the respondents are willing to definitely accept the HPV vaccine 70.0% while 30.0% are not willing to accept the HPV vaccine. Majority of the respondents 80% believes they are able to access a clinic/doctor for vaccination. Majority of the respondents 95% believes vaccines are beneficial. The major sources of information on HPV vaccine were from health personnel (39.0%) and Workshop/conferences (30.0%). With regard to risk factors for cervical cancer, the largest risk factors for cervical cancer reported by women were multiple sexual partners (35.5%). In addition, about (34.0%) mentioned early sexual intercourse while (20.0%) identified HPV infection. Concerning on knowledge of HPV prevention measures, there was predominantly positive attitude towards the use of HPV vaccination for prevention of cervical cancer among respondents; hence the high rate of desire by mothers to vaccinate their daughters.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of respondents.

No Characteristics Frequency
N=300
Percent
Age
1 <30 38.0 27.2
2 30–39 32.9 44.7
3 40–49 21.4 21.4
4 50 7.8 5.7
Marital Status
1 Married 234 78.0
2 Single 54 18.0
3 Widowed 3 1.0
5 Separated 3 1.0
4 Divorced 9 3.0
Religion
1 Christian 264 88.0
2 Muslim 36 12.0
3 Others
Occupation
1 Civil servant 90 30.0
2 Health worker 60 20.0
3 Business/Trading 54 18
4 Artisan 15 5.0
5 Housewife 81 27.0
Highest level of Education
1 Non formal 30 10.0
2 Primary 15 5.0
3 Secondary 45 15.0
4 Tertiary 210 70.0

Table 2. Knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV and HPV vaccine.

No Items Frequency N=300 Percent
Awareness of cervical cancer
1 Yes 255 85.0
2 No 45 15.0
Awareness of HPV
1 Yes 180 60.0
2 No 120 40.0
Awareness of HPV Vaccine
1 Yes 186 62.0
2 No 114 38.0
Willing to definitely accept the HPV vaccine
1 Yes 210 70.0
2 No 90 30.0
Believes they are able to access a clinic/doctor for vaccination
1 Yes 240 80.0
2 No 60 20.0
Believes vaccines are beneficial
1 Yes 285 95.0
2 No 15 5.0
Sources of information
1 Mass/ Social Media 36 12.0
2 Health workers 117 39.0
3 Workshop/conferences 90 30.0
4 Internet 6 2.0
5 television and radio 9 3.0
6 Newspaper 6 2.0
7 Church 30 10.0
7 Others 6 2.0
Risk Factors for cervical cancer
1 Early Sexual intercourse 102 34.0
2 HPV infection 60 20.0
3 Multiple sexual partners 105 35.0
4 Cigarette smoking 18 6.0
5 Kissing 6 2.0
6 I don’t knowledge 9 3.0
Knowledge of HPV prevention Measures
1 Immunization by HPV Vaccine 105 35.0
2 Sexual abstinence 75 25.0
3 Use of condoms 60 20.0
4 Safe Sex practices 45 15.0
5 Screening for preinvasive lesions as well as early diagnosis of invasive carcinoma 6 2.0
6 None of the above 9 3.0

Out of the 272/300 mothers who had positive attitude to HPV vaccination seen in this study, only 28/300 of them had actually had their daughters vaccinated. Vaccination practice of women with positive attitudinal response to HPV vaccination was significantly lower than those without p=0.02, 95% CI, OR=0.48 (0.90-0.89). Positive attitude significantly led to desire or intention to vaccinate daughters. P values ranges from 0.00 – 0.04. The attitude of mothers to the statement “HPV Vaccination may lead to daughters early onset of sexual activity and HPV vaccination violates my cultural and religious beliefs and safety of the vaccine’s administration” was not statistically significant in influencing mothers desire to vaccinate their daughters against HPV. P value=0.14 and 0.60 respectively. Only three attitudinal parameters; “vaccination of my daughters will prompt early sexual activity and cost of HPV vaccination being a barrier to vaccination” had statistically significant influence on the practice of HPV vaccination of daughters. Positive attitude to cost of HPV vaccine significantly increased up take of HPV vaccination of daughters while negative attitude to daughters’ early onset of sexual activity significantly reduced up take. P value =0.04 and 0.007 respectively.

Table 4 shows reasons for participating and non- participating of HPV vaccination. About 60.8% and 64.7% of those that had desire to vaccinate, but had not, gave high cost and non-availability of vaccine as their main hindrance. About 90.0% of those respondents that vaccinated their daughters gave fear and life experiences of cervical cancer as the dominant reasons for doing so. Health workers influenced daughters ‘vaccination in 75.5% of cases, while the others (3.0%) were influenced to vaccinate their daughter by their relatives. The average age of daughters at vaccination was 10 ± 0.75 years. Ten (29.6%) of those that initiated vaccination defaulted.

Table 3. Adolescent Mothers attitude towards vaccination of their daughters.

Items Attitude n (%)
SD D U A SA Predominant attitude
1. HPV Vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer 15.5% 5.5% 35% 30% 14% Positive
2. HPV vaccine can cause severe HPV infection 30.5% 15.5% 37% 11.5% 5.5% Positive
3. Vaccination of Adolescent Girls will quick earlier sexual activity 30.5% 20 % 35.5% 5.5% 8.5% Positive
4. HPV may have protracted negative effect on Adolescent Girls 23% 22.5% 35.5% 10.5% 7.5% Positive
5. Short-term side effects 9.5% 10.5% 31.5% 30.5% 18% Positive
6. Availability of HPV Vaccine 10.5% 11.5% 30.5% 31.5% 16% Positive
7. Unknown future side effects 3.0% 12.3% 32.3% 33.7% 18.7% Positive
8. Cost of HPV is a major barrier to HPV vaccination of Adolescent Girls 17.0% 15% 30.7% 30.3% 7.0% Negative
9. HPV vaccination violates cultural norms and my religious beliefs 17.5% 15.0 42.1% 13.2% 12.2% Negative
10. Safety of vaccine’s administration 15.2% 18% 26.7% 30.3% 9.9% Negative

Table 4. Factors influencing practice of HPV vaccination of daughters.

No Factors influencing practice Frequency(n=300) Percent
A. Reasons for Vaccinating my daughter
1 Fear of Cervical cancer 272 90.5%
2 As routine immunization 62 20.75
3 Life experience of cervical cancer 52 17.3%
4 To prevent STD 89 29.6%)
5 Others 9 3.0%
B. Who influenced the vaccination
1 Health worker 227 75.5%
2 Relatives 48 15.2%
3 Friends 28 9.3%
C. Reasons for not Vaccinating my daughter
1 Concerned for side effects 171 56.9%
2 High cost of HPV vaccine 182 60.8%
3 Non availability of HPV vaccine 194 64.7%
4 Fear of promoting sexual promiscuity 272 90.5%

Discussion

This study describes the knowledge, attitude, desire and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls by their mothers in Eldoret. It provides insights into mothers in Eldoret perspectives on whether cervical cancer is preventable and or curable. The introduction of HPV vaccination as a measure to combat the bane of cervical cancer in women is well commended but has involved a lot of concern and research. This HPV vaccination essentially targets adolescent girls classed as minors that need parental approval for vaccine administration. The parental awareness, attitude, intention and acceptance of HPV vaccination for their daughters have become relevant for the success of the cervical cancer preventive program. This study found a high level (85.0%) of cervical cancer awareness but much lower awareness of HPV (60.0%) and HPV vaccine (62.0%). This findings were comparable but slightly higher than 91% awareness level for cervical smear and 62.7% for HPV vaccination reported among women health workers in Kenya and this collaborated with others within and Kenya [1,2,17]. Being a health worker probably exposed them to the milieu of health information, which explains the higher awareness. While in research conducted by Trim et al., 2012 on Parental knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours towards Human Papillmavirus Vaccination for their Children, an average of 74.0% of responders knew the relationship between cervical cancer and HPV, only 20.0% of this respondents population identified HPV as a risk factor for cervical cancer. Although the awareness of HPV reported in this study was quite lower than that reported in a study among women health workers in Kenya and the range of 64.7–93.0% reported in a systematic review by Trim et al. (2012), the awareness of HPV vaccine in our study was higher than that of the study in review of [1,2,17], but was within the range of 47-64.5% reported in the systematic The mean age of the respondents of 34 years found in this study was comparable to 41.3 ± 9.4 years reported in other studies [18,19]

Most (70.0%) of the respondents had tertiary education, this was quite higher than 55.7% and 58.3% reported in other studies to have graduate degrees [18,19]. Mairaing et al. [20] in a study on maternal acceptance, attitude and knowledge on human papilloma virus vaccination of daughters reported that the basic knowledge of HPV was found to be higher in those that had higher education. Two hundred and ten (70%) respondents desired to vaccinate their daughters against HPV however only 90 (30%) that are not willing to accept HPV vaccine.

Also, Hamlish et al. [21] in a study on barriers to HPV immunization for African American adolescent females reported that limited knowledge of HPV connection to cervical cancer led to reduced acceptability. This study found no significant effects of level of education to acceptability of and practice of HPV vaccination (p=0.969). Despite moderate level of awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine, and poor depth of HPV knowledge, most parents (70%) still indicated intentions to vaccinate their daughters in this study. This was lower than 76% reported in another study and the range of 47-79.5% noted in the systematic review by Trim et al. [22] and Dahlstrom et al. [23] on Attitudes to HPV vaccination among parents of children aged 12-15 years a population-based survey in Sweden. On the whole, this study found a typically positive attitude towards HPV vaccine among mothers of adolescent girls in Eldoret, Kenya. This led significantly to high intent to vaccinate their daughters. Only in three parameters out of ten parameters did negative attitude dominate their intention.

This finding thus consistent with Hertweck et al. [24] that intention to vaccinate was considerably predicated on attitude and apparent behavioral control. Positive attitudes, nevertheless do not at all times lead to overriding practice. This study found out that a lower number of mothers with positive attitude vaccinated their adolescent girls. P=0.02, 95% CI, odd ratio 0.48 (0.19-0.89). This possibly reflected the influence of other factors on mothers participating in HPV vaccination for their daughters. Positive attitude to cost significantly influenced participating in HPV vaccination. This is quite applicable in developing countries with low resource such as Kenya where many mothers may not have the funds for the HPV vaccine. Only 28 (9.4%) of the respondents had initiated vaccination for their daughters in this study. Though this is lower but it is comparable to the 19.0-21.0 % participants rate reported in other studies [18, 25, 26].

The fear for cervical cancer, and life experiences of cervical cancer are the predominant reasons for mothers of adolescent girls to participate in HPV vaccination. Participating in HPV vaccination in our population while lack of awareness of HPV vaccine, concern about efficacy and adverse side effects of HPV vaccine, high cost of HPV vaccine and young age of their adolescent girls were explanation given by mothers that did not vaccinate their daughters. This concurred with other studies that identified fear of side effects of vaccine, perceiving the HPV vaccine as risky and belief that vaccine is experimental, low knowledge of HPV vaccine and cervical cancer and not participating in routine cervical smear as reasons for reduced intention to vaccinate and participating in HPV vaccination for their adolescent girls [18, 20, 27].

Conclusion

Even though the results of this study may have limited generalized, they provide an insight into the knowledge, attitude, desire and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls and factor that determine intent and practice of HPV vaccination of adolescent girls by their mothers in Eldoret from the parental perspective.

We conclude that the awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine for prevention of cervical cancer is still suboptimal among mothers of adolescent daughters in our environment. There was predominantly positive attitude towards the use of HPV vaccination for prevention of cervical cancer among respondents; hence the high rate of desire by mothers to vaccinate their daughters. The practice of the HPV vaccination by mothers of adolescent girls was still low. There is need for increased awareness creation by government agencies and caring physicians. The government departments responsible for routine immunization should latch on this positive attitude by mothers to increase uptake by making HPV vaccination part of routine immunization for the adolescent.

There is need for policy to guide and unify various stake holder efforts in the struggle against an increasing cervical cancer burden. On the other hand the policy will also save as a legal framework for service users, NGOs and activists to base their arguments on, when advocating for more financial and technical support from government and its partners that are playing different roles in combating cervical cancer in Kenya.

Suggestions for Further Study

The introduction of HPV vaccination as antidote and prevention of cervical cancer its acceptance as well as importance has only been undertaken in moderation in developing countries where there is poor resource where it’s use is most desirable. This pilot study conducted in gynocare hospital Eldoret had limited number of mothers accompanying their minors to the clinic. This prevented the conduct of randomization and may limit the generalization of the outcome of this study.

It will be necessary for a further study to be carried out in other related areas to supplement the findings i.e. a population based study is planned to further examine the challenges of use of HPV vaccine in our environment. A similar study among the youths may also be of importance in further identifying issues that affect uptake of vaccination against HPV and would be of pertinence in program planning. Also, there is need for further research to establish how negative attitude towards cervical cancer screening procedure interact and affect management of cervical cancer in Kenya.

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge Mr Bolaji for data entry and questionnaire administration and the mothers who participated in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. Gichangi P, Estambale B, Bwayo J, et al. Knowledge and practice about cervical cancer and Pap smear testing among patients at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi,Kenya. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2003; 13: 827–833.

  2. Ngugi CW, Boga H, Muigai AWT, et al. Factors affecting uptake of cervical cancer early detection measures among women in Thika, Kenya. Health Care Women Int. 2012; 33:595–613.

  3. World Health Organization. Comprehensive cervical cancer prevention & control: a healthier future for girls and women. 2013.

  4. De Freitas AC, Coimbra EC, Leitão Mda CG. Molecular targets of HPV oncoproteins: potential biomarkers for cervical carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1845(2):91–103.

  5. Flepisi BT, Bouic P, Sissolak G, et al. Biomarkers of HIV-associated Cancer. Biomark Cancer. 2014;3:11–20.

  6. Koutsky LA, Galloway DA, Holmes KK. Epidermiology of genital HPV. Epidemiol Rev. 2018; 10: 122-163.

  7. Ho GY, Studentsov Y, Hall CB. Risk factors for subsequent cervicovaginal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the protective role of antibodies to HPV-16 virus-like particles. J Infect Dis. 2002; 186: 737–742.

  8. Seoud M, Tjalma WA,Ronsse V. Cervical adenocarconoma, moving towards a better prevention. Vaccine. 2011; 29: 9148-9158.

  9. American college of Obstetrician and gynecologists. Human papillomavirus vaccination. Committee opinion No. 641. Obstet Gynecol . 2015; 126: e38-43.

  10. Petrosky E, Bocchini JA, Hariri S, et al. Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPVvaccination recommendation of the adversary committee on immunizationpractices. Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64: 300-304.

  11. The future 11 study group. Quadravalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high grade cervical lesions. New Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1915-1927.

  12. FDA. Licensure of bivalent Human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervirax) for use in females and updated HPV vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on immunization practices (ACIP) Morbidity and Mortality weekly report. 2010; 59: 626-629.

  13. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M,, et al. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine; Recommendation of the adversary on immunization practices(ACIP). MMWR. 2007; 56: 1-24.

  14. Villa LL, Costa RLR, Petta CA. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre Phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6, 271-8.

  15. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler CM, et al. Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papilloma virus types 16 and 18: Follow-up from a randomised control trial. Lancet. 2006; 367:1247-55.

  16. World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus vaccines WHO position paper. Weekly Epidemiol Rec. 2009; 15 (84):117-132.

  17. Omondi-Ogutu, M’Imunya JM. Parental acceptance of human papilloma virus vaccine for their pre-pubertal and teenage daughters. East Afr Med J. 2012; 88:163–70.

  18. Munsell D, Gray C, Reed J, et al. A study of woman and mothers of minor age daughters knowledge of HPV as well as the attitudes towards the HPV vaccine. The internet Journal of Academics Physician Assistants. 2009.

  19. Natan MB, Aharon O, Palickshvili S, et al. Attitude of Israeli Mothers with Vaccination of their Daughters against human papilloma virus. J pediatric nurs. 2011; 26: 70-77.

  20. Mairaing K, Suwannarurk, Thaweekul Y, et al. (2012) Maternal acceptance, attitude and knowledge on human papilloma virus vaccination for their daughters. J Med Assoc Thai 95: S33-41.

  21. Hamlish T, Clarke L, Alexander KA (2012) Barriers to HPV immunization for African American adolescent females. Vaccine 30: 6472-6476.

  22. Trim K, Nagji N, Elit L, et al. Parental knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours towards Human Papillmavirus Vaccination for Their Children: A Systematic Review from 2001 to 2011. Obstetrics and Gynaecology internatiol. 2012.

  23. Dahlstrom LA, Tran TN, Lundholm C, et al. Attitudes to HPV vaccination among parents of children aged 12-15 years a population-based survey in Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2009; 126: 500-507.

  24. Hertweck SP, LaJoie AS, Pinto MD, et al. Health care decision making by mothers for their adolescent daughters regarding the quadrivalent HPV vaccine. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26: 96-101.

  25. Odetola TD, Ekpo K. Nigeria Women’s Perceptions about Human Papillomavirus Immunization. J Community Med Health Educ. 2012; 2: 191.

  26. Liu FW, Vwalika B, Hacker Michele R, et al. Cervical cancer and HPV Vaccination: Knowledge and Attitudes of Adult. 2012.

  27. Craciun C, Baban A. Who will take the blame?: understanding the reasons why Romanian mothers decline HPV vaccination for their daughters. Vaccine. 2012; 30: 6789-6793.

  28. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. (2013) Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Received: June 28, 2018.
Accepted: July 10, 2018.
Published: July 13, 2018.

To cite this article : Mabeya H, Menon S, Kaihura D, et al. Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination and adolescent girls in eldoret, Kenya. British Journal of Cancer Research. 2018: 1:2.

© Mabeya H, et al. 2018.